systemose.blogg.se

Amazon glacier vs backblaze b2
Amazon glacier vs backblaze b2






Otherwise, Wasabi remains a viable choice for long-term storage as well, closely followed by BackBlaze B2. It can be supplemented with the Microsoft LRS Archive tier (some tinkering required) for immutable backup containers. It seems as of today, Wasabi offers the most compatible and cost-effective backup target.

  • When storage needs approach 2 Tb Crashplan Pro again becomes an option, however, performance is a concern. Amazon’s Glacier costs 0.
  • Synology promised B2 support in Hyper Backup in 2018 Comparatively, Amazon S3 looks ridiculously pricey at 0.023 per GB/Month.

    amazon glacier vs backblaze b2

    Wasabi similarly offers pricing at 0.0059 per GB/Month (minimum 1TB 5.99). Backblaze B2 is not supported by Synology’s Hyper Backup. Backblaze B2 offers storage for 0.005 per GB/Month.Amazon Glacier and Azure Archive require blob level management and due to thawing/rehydration requirements will likely never be supported in Hyper Backup or similar automatic backup software that said it is a perfect target for one-way sync of encrypted backup containers with immutable objects – such as Duplicacy.

    amazon glacier vs backblaze b2

    This is the costs of cloud storage as of the date of this posting Providerįor the purposes of Backup keep in mind the following intricacies:








    Amazon glacier vs backblaze b2